Rhetoric and Life

Dylan Macknight Mrs. Womack Per. 6 14, September 2009. Value of Life Essay antithetic authors use different techniques to work. The trio main ways of persuading are through with(predicate) pathos, which uses emotions, ethos, which proves their credibility, and password, which implies the general message. Shakespeare, Lance Armstrong, and Amanda Ripley perk up tout ensemble written articles arguing their judgment on the revalue of life. Of the three articles Lance Armstrong best persuades the audience with his transmission line that life is very precious and that you could better your life from something negative, through his special use of both logos and pathos.Armstrong applies the use of ethos very clearly in his article. For example, I still dont completely understand it all I can do is tell you what happened. This shows that he is written material probable work and that his ideas are non-bias. He is telling the story as is and he is not trying to lead you on. Lance also uses pathos to persuade his audience as well. An example of this would be when stated I have cancer. Cancer is a serious disease and the thought of having it draws on some superstars emotions quite strongly.This quote made the reader tincture sympathy for him. Overall, Armstrong did the best job at persuading. In small towns Soliloquy, Shakespeare uses ethos, pathos, and logos as an attempt to persuade his audience, but is not as effective as Armstrong. Shakespeare uses logos the most in his work. When he states To be or not to be, that is the question, he is portraying the message of how frequently his own life is worth, personally, not how valuable life is a whole. That is one downfall in Shakespeares work compared to Armstrongs.Another reason Hamlets Soliloquy is not as successful at persuading is because in his writing there is no one else to compare and contrast their life with. Hamlet is written as somebody who is contemplating suicide. It is very hard to understand soulfulnesss thoughts and interpret them as they were intended to be. This is what makes the soliloquy quite imperfect in persuading the reader. Amanda Ripley voices her belief on what a life is worth in the article that she wrote for Time Magazine.She argued how much money one can put to anothers life, and if different people should be worth more(prenominal) or less then others. Time Magazine and CNN took a study last month stating, 86% of the people should have received the aforementioned(prenominal) amount. Who is to say that the majority of humans are worth the same dollar amount and a select few should receive more money. Many people do not agree with the way Ripley argues her opinion in What a Life is Worth. She states, I am olympian of what my country tried to do, I think the intention is noble.This shows that she had a previous opinion on the subject prior to the article that she had written. That adds a possibility that the article is prone to being bias towards her opinion. That is how Ripley failed to persuade her readers. Ultimately, of the three articles, Lance Armstrong best persuades his audience with his argument that life is very valuable and that you can better your life from something negative, through his exceptional use of logos and pathos. Many of his readers are left feeling completely persuaded by his value on life.