Response essay over 2 articles Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Response over 2 articles - Essay ExampleAccording to Hoye, on several occasions the US supreme court has unflinching that state laws and practices have violated basic Americans liberties (Maxwell et al 65). Although the law clearly stipulates different rights accorded to individuals that allow them to be off the administration interference, there is a limit to it. It is the duty of the Supreme Court to interpret the law and determines the extent of violation. On several cases in Texas submit, the Supreme Court was confronted with issues that would deny individuals their rights to liberty. First, in 2005, Thomas forefront Orden brought a case against the state of Texas for allowing a six-foot by four-foot granite monument displaying the Ten Commandments on the grounds of a capital building. Orden felt that this is against the rights to religion given by the states by the first-year amendment. Despite a cinque against four votes, the judge ruled in favour of Texas State. The firs t amendment gives the right to freedom of worship and prohibits the government or a state from passing legislation that prefer one religion to an opposite. This ruling doer that the Supreme Court has the right to make a different interpretation from the rights given to the states. Secondly, an appealed case of Greg Johnson versus Texas State depicts how the Supreme Court can deny individuals the rights of expression. A law exists in the US that demands to honour the signal as a consecrated object. Tampering with the same means dishonour and desecration of the swag. In 1984 summer, in Dallas, Johnson who was leading other protesters burned the flag of US. The Supreme Court found him guilty of desecration of the flag and sentenced him for one year in prison with some fines. However, Texas criminal of court appeals overturned this ruling ground on the first amendment that gives individuals rights to freedom of expression. Johnsons conduct was expressive and thus protected by the fi rst amendment and the fourteenth amendment. Again, this depicts that Supreme Courts can make mistakes, which are subject to correction through appeals by other courts. Lastly, although Texas courts have the most appeals cases compared to other states, arguably, they rank top in the number of cases reported for capital punishments (Maxwell et al. 66). Apparently, this is fostered by poor politics in the state that undermines individualism and the rights of the citizens. The state seems to live in the old times when this was acceptable. Therefore, nobody questions the existence of Sam Houston sculpture that represents the capital regime. Additionally, privacy rights advocate for abortion of innocent children against the tender rights Governor EJ Davis and His Legacy for Texas Gauging from past leaders, the type of leadership offered by various governments determines the support they get from their subjects. This publisher will examine the government of E J Davis, different policies he passed to his subjects and the balance between individual(prenominal) liberty and order. Many historians describe the government of Davis as the worst in Texas leadership history. Although, Davis was an honest, intelligent, and had a with child(p) vision for Texas, the type of people he chose to lead with were not equal to the task. Davis mistrusted the former Texas confederates who were bright decorous to assist in his leadership. Davis used state power to enforce civil rights and political rights of former