Miranda V. Arizona Law - 1213 Words

Miranda v. Arizona LisaMarie Brayden Professor Bubnis ADJU – 202 – 5481 April 3, 2016 Abstract â€Å"You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you (What Are Your Miranda Rights?, 2016).† Miranda Law came into existence in June 1966 when the United States Supreme Court safeguarded the 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. Miranda Warning is a ruling that allows defendants to remain silent, while being questioned by law enforcement and prosecutors, unless they have been previously advised of their Miranda Rights. Most people are not aware of their fundamental rights at the time of their arrest and / or interrogation. Under the 5th Amendment law the Miranda warning informs defendants of these rights and protects them from incriminating themselves. Keywords: Miranda, Warning, Rights Miranda v. Arizona As a citizen of The United States of America you rely on due process of law to safeguard your equal protection of life, liberty and property. The case of Miranda v. Arizona was just that. This was a case, where new constitutional guidelines were created to ensure one’s individual rights. This important change effected the 5th, 6th, and the 14th Amendments, by informing a defendant of their rights and protecting one from implicating themselves. Any statements that are obtained without first informing defendant of theseShow MoreRelatedMiranda V. Arizona Case Law2396 Words   |  10 Pagesour Judicial System and case law becomes of it. Sometimes, the case law is beneficial for the government such as Florence v Board of Chosen Freeholders of Burlington County, citing that strip searches of inmates regardless of the crimes they committed without probable cause is justified in the interest of inmate, staff, and jail safety. Other case law such as Miranda v. Arizona it reinforces co nstitutional rights for United States citizens. Miranda v. Arizona is case law that mandates the governmentRead MoreThe Mirand Case Versus the State of Arizona901 Words   |  4 Pages Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark case because now almost everybody knows about this case because of the Miranda Rights that were a direct result of this case, and the Supreme Court’s ruling. The Supreme Courts ruling that it was against Miranda’s rights, then because of this decision they made the Miranda Rights. The Supreme Court was correct in the ruling of Miranda v. Arizona, which they ruled in favor of Ernesto Miranda because his fifth and sixth amendment rights were violated. They wereRead MoreThe Rights Of The Supreme Court1290 Words   |  6 PagesYou have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be held against you in a court of law...† These famous words, so often heard in movies and television shows as a character is arrested, are well known to Americans. But why are law enforcement officials mandated to repeat this to individuals they arrest? Where did it come from? In Miranda V. Arizona, a case taken all the way to the Supreme Cour t in 1966, it was decided that constitutional rights must be made clear to the defendantRead MoreMiranda V. Arizona Case Essay1272 Words   |  6 PagesMiranda V. Arizona has been a case that impacted our police officers and offenders and is still in place today. In 1996 Phoenix Arizona Ernesto Miranda a 18 year old school drop out with a 8th grade reading level was convicted of kidnaping and rapping a 18 year old girl.. He was a troubled teen growing up convicted of small offenses but this offense made the headlights. The women who was raped went home and told her family, one day her brother sees a car that matches the description and part ofRead MoreMiranda Vs. Arizona Law1210 Words   |  5 PagesMiranda rights are a set of warning imposed by the courts after the Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 decision that occurred June 13, 1966. As stated by Cassell the rights are: You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to talk to a lawyer and have him present with you while you are being questioned. If you cannot afford to hire a lawyer, one will be appointed to represent you before you answer any questions.Read MoreThe Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 affected the rights of the accused and the1000 Words   |  4 Pages The Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona in 1966 affected the rights of the accused and the responsibilities of law enforcement. Miranda v. Arizona is known as the â€Å"right to remain silent† case. â€Å"I must tell you first you have the right to remain silent. If you choose not to remain silent, anything you say or write can and will be used as evidence against you in court. You have the right to consult a lawyer before any questioning, and you have the right to have the lawyer present with you duringRead MoreMiranda Rights Essay1547 Words   |  7 PagesMiranda Rights Everyone has heard the term Miranda Rights, whether that be when taking a law class, during the course of a television show, or perhaps through personal experience with their use, but what do these two words really mean, where did they come from and how to they apply to an individuals everyday life? The answers to this question are neither simple nor fully answered today, as challenges to Miranda Rights appear in courtrooms routinely. However, the basis for Miranda Rights canRead MoreHow Interrogation Worked Before Many Important Cases1575 Words   |  7 PagesAnything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have a right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you.† These are the words every juvenile hears as they are being taken into custody. Many juveniles do not understand or misinterpret the Miranda warning they are given. Juvenile are treated with a lesser degree of harshness from wording to punishment when de aling with law enforcement in comparison to adults. But while being interrogatedRead MoreMiranda V Arizona1284 Words   |  6 PagesMiranda v. Arizona: Half a Century Later by: September 2nd, 2014 I. INTRODUCTION A. Executive Summary – In 1966, the U.S. Supreme Court deliberated the case Miranda v. Arizona the most important aspect of due process and criminal procedure ever affecting law enforcement and prosecutorial conduct of an investigation. The main issues in this case were: * The admissibility of a defendant’s statements if such statements were made while the defendant was held in police custody or deprivedRead More Suspects Need Their Miranda Rights Essay1746 Words   |  7 Pagesrequired to read the Miranda warning if they believe the confession will be used to convict the suspect. The constitutional basis for the Miranda warning and the conditions for a voluntary waiver of the Miranda rights were announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in Miranda v. Arizona. Miranda v. Arizona, announced June, 13 1966, resolved four separate criminal appeals concerning the role of the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution in police interrogations of criminal suspects. An Arizona jury convicted Ernesto